According to the University of Public Relations of Religions news, the Summit of “Problemology of Religious Thought and Gender Development of Contemporary age” by the Faculty of Women and Family University of Religions and Denominations in collaboration with the research Institute of Women and Family in the Shahid Beheshti Hall of Religions and Denominations with the presence of professors and students with the lecture of Hojat-ul-islam Amir Mohajer Milani, a faculty member of the Institute of Women and Family, was held.
Hojat-ul-islam Amir Mohajer Milani, the faculty member of the research Institute of Women and Family, pointed to the recognition of the confrontation of the religious thought system against revival and modernity: There have been many developments in the struggle between religion and revival. Along this path we have to first understand the logic of the religious order and the world of revival thought.
Amir Mohajer Milani continued: Today, little revival systems are attack to the structure of religious thought. The logic of modernity has such power that if it requires can easily serve all religious affairs. A huge neglect of revival is this; Because religious thought in Iran is accompanied by added illusion. Therefore, he has always been present in revival playground. Playing on the ground encompasses all religious dignity and deprives the presence of religious thought.
The modernity thought dominates all dignity of the Eastern man
The faculty member of the research Institute of Women and Family further with attention to departed Darius Shayegan’s thought: Religious man in revival world thought life has built the giant that this giant today has compressed this man. In other words, in contrast of religious thought and revival is assumption that can be played with modernity. But unaware that this self -made giant has dominated all aspects of the Eastern man.
Milani raised an important question in Western political thought: How is the life of a Muslim woman or man transformed? In the initial response, it can be concluded that the Muslim woman is faced with a great dual. On the one hand, she wants to maintain his religious thought in all aspects and socially, and on the other hand, she wants to have modernist and revival thought. This is a very important dual. Because it should be realized that is impossible to get together this dual.
Revival is not captured by the logic of ijtihad
The female and family researcher by allusion to the confrontation of the dual narratives of religion and modernity emphasized: Modernity was an uninvited guest that, with his logic, could serve religious thought and non –amorous to revival for itself in Iran. In this game, even the “logic of ijtihad” has been captured by modern logic. Therefore, the intervention of “modernity gene” will face religious thought. The selection choice of the world of revival and its interference in religious affairs will only capture religious thought on its game.
He continued: Neglecting this issue has caught the history of religious life in Iran. Therefore, in the 150 years history of Iranian thought with modernity, there was no larger and more devastating error than “accepting modernity narrative of tradition and covering traditional and religious clothing on modern affairs”. Even Western thinkers have pointed out that duplicity of modernity and revival is home burner and slayer of religious thought and western people.
Theoretical Support for Revival
The faculty member of the research Institute of Women and Family stated: Although the enlightened narrative of modernity in France dominated this narrative. But sanctification created a part of the concept of science in Iran and the support of religious thought of the concepts of modernization discover it. Because the categories of modernity are inherently worldly, and if we cover this things with otherworldly things, they will be in the serve of modernity and revival at the end. So that the logic of revival comes and takes the logic of other world on its serve. And this is one of the disruptions of religious thought. The inability to narrate religious thought and present it in revival formats will lead to fail the religious thought. The developments of sexual and gender in the contemporary age in the role of revival thought and served the religious thoughts model for itself.
Amir Mohajer Milani said: “Today, if we ask most religious scholars and experts in the field of gender and sex, we will find the answer that; They have not gone beyond the religious thought of the martyr Motahhari and before Motahari they have no cognitive in their references. Therefore, the set of these factors has led to a disruption to the body of religious thought.
He noted that the developments of sexual and gender in the contemporary age have served the role of modern thought and the models of religious thought. For example, in the subject: Marriage, Divorce, Mother’s Concept, and couple relations we are under attack by revival thought. Assuming; Modernity says marriage is slavery and passive religious thought responds, no, marriage is not slavery. Then you will unconsciously seek refuge in such interpretations of such “marriage, a bureaucratic, marriage means finding your own half -hidden, and so on.” Unaware that this is the same game on the ground of revival and the concepts that religious thought combine with revival theology!