Thematic and jurisprudential foundations of shadow from the point of view of the schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

One of the taboos of Ihram discussed in Islamic jurisprudence books is Istizhal. However, there is a difference in the subject of shadowing and its examples, and this difference is caused by the type of jurisprudential foundations of the jurists.It is well-known among jurists that the sanctity of Tazleel is in the state of movement for a person, which means that the person is not at home.Emergencies are situations such as illness, cold, etc.

But the sanctity of shadows at night is due to the absence of light or due to being covered? Is the order of honor of tazleel assigned to a person who is capable and not to a person who is in need? The shadows at night among Imami jurists, which have been raised in recent centuries, in the eyes of some jurists, shadow and shadow are only imagined during the day and with the presence of the sun, but at night when there is no sun and light, shadow is not imagined; because it is a non-existent thing. A number of other jurists consider shadow to be an existential matter and do not recognize any difference between night and day. The opinions and opinions of the scholars are different on the issue of shadowing at night during Ihram, according to some jurists of the Jafari sect, the subject of shadowing at night is not true and is permissible. Some others consider it absolutely forbidden. Some others consider it absolutely forbidden. A number of jurists have also given the order of sanctity to cold and rainy nights. It is haram to glorify the head of a mahram person only when traveling. If Muharram has settled in a place, there is no obstacle to putting shade on his head with an umbrella or the like. Even if Muharram is walking, he should be under the shade. It is not permissible for a Muharram man to be glorified by means of movable canopies such as Mahmal, Synagogue and Hodge, but there is no problem with fixed canopies such as walls and bridges. This article is done with the aim of understanding and explaining the problem of ghosting at night and its evidence. To achieve this goal, it is possible to describe and analyze jurisprudential propositions by collecting library data. The result of which is the explanation and analysis of views and evidence on the issue of shadows at night.