Reflections on the religious orientation of Mugattel bin Suleiman, with emphasis on his verbal opinions

Author:
Ali javazan
Level:
Master
Subject(s):
The difference between Shiites
Language:
Farsi
Faculty:
Faculty of Shi’i Studies
Year:
2016
Publisher:
URD Press
Supervisor(s):
Mohammad Hasan Mohammadi Mozaffar
Advisor(s):
Mostafa Soltani

The present research has been written in order to analyze the thoughts of one of the scholars of the second century AH. Mugattel bin Suleiman is one of the influential thinkers in the second century AH. Which attributed the oldest interpretation of the Quran to him. His writings can be used as a reliable reference for all religions due to their scientific richness and comprehensiveness. ecause of being scientific, are a reliable reference point for all religions because of their scientific nature. As if most writers have used the good of his works throughout history. As many writers used her works well in during the course of history Unfortunately, with all the influence of Mugattel, no significant contribution was made to his knowledge of his ideas) or not written or if or not complete research). In the first chapter of this study, the biography of this Khorasani scientist, which, was also discussed It was a Full swing. And in the second chapter given that Considering that there is great controversy among Shia and Sunni theologians about their ideas The level of acceptance of his personality was discussed with Shia and Sunni scholars. Most of the Scientists of two sects his character especially in the hadith, but he spoke in commentary. In the meantime orientalists accepted the most Sunni views. In part of this research, he pointed to the issue of his nominative similarity, which has led to great oppression. In part of this research, he pointed to the problem of nominative similarity that caused great oppression to him. The proportions given to this great scientist are due to the fact that he does not specify the name Mugattel, which is mentioned in historical documents unknowingly.  On the other hand, he lived in an age where the distortion of works and ideas is abundantly seen. The circumstances of his period, which were all kinds of political and social pressures, was another reason to obscure his character. In the last chapter, the verbal votes of this great commentator were his neutrality towards the existing religions. Therefore, Zaidi who attributed some of his ancestors to him, has been strongly rejected. Thus, Zaidi, who attributed some of his ancestors to him, has been strongly rejected In this way, his zaidi, attributed to him by some of the ancient and recent, has definitely been rejected.