The difference between the verbal method of Sheikh Sadouq and Aboـbakr AlـKhalal and its fruits in theology

Sheikh Sadouq and Khalal are among the famous personalities of Hadith and two famous figures from the century, each with a certain theological method. We have expressed the position of reason and the method of obtaining them in verbal matters and in the following points of the sharing and differentiation of the verbal method and its effect on theology of each. The position of reason and the amount of its application to these two characters are among the differences between the two, and they have the greatest effect on their religion. Some people recognize Sheikh Sadouq as a scholar or hadithistic, but in fact he is a hadithistic who has used reason in many cases. Of course, he means wisdom, natural wisdom, but khalal does not understand reason and rational reasoning in verbal matters, and even one item is not found in his writings, and in the interpretive method, the appearance of the verses of the monotheistic is invoked, and his only method of interpretation is the method of emanation, unlike Sheikh Sadouq, who has used multiple interpretive methods. In the hadith method, each has followed a certain method. khalal only narrates from the companions of the hadith prophet, but Sheikh Sadouq considers Ahl alـBait as the main source of prophetic words, although he narrated from the companions of the Prophet. The result of the difference in the method in these cases is observed in the problem of interpretation, which is the extract of these topics. Khalal does not accept the interpretation, and the result is the proof of the members and the place for the Lord, but Sheikh Sadouq, by means of interpretation and with the help of natural wisdom, transmits the verses and monotheistic narratives to their apparent nonـmeaning and abandons themselves from belief in likeness.