Analysis and critique of the noetic role of Salafi’s reason of Ibn Taymiyyah with emphasis on Mulla Sadra’s philosophical reason

   Including explanation of deviations religious sects and beliefs, analysis and critique of their principles. Thus, to combat the growth of Salafism as the main current threat to the Muslim world The first step is to review the current structure of thought, especially concerning the specific issue of the intellect and its epistemological value. The analysis and critique Salafism approach in the implementation of the system of intellectualism because reason Sadraee the results will be significant. Ibn Taymiyyah and Salafis reason to look at its function as a natural instinct of man is confined to economic issues and the epistemological just as canny having valid. This view shows the reduced status as a source of reason is understanding the Salafist look. As a result of this view in the field of religious knowledge is that Salafi reason of Ibn Taymiyyah from the perspective of cognitive knowledge is worthless and the status of religious quote is after and is valid when its results in accordance with religious reason. In other words reason Salafi religious cognition responsible for the isolation is complete. But reason in the human soul and perception Sadra as excellent position independent and have the authority and prestige of a epistemic value is unmatched. The result is that the reason of the philosopher in the field of religious knowledge as a cognitive alongside religious quote is validated and perceptions are considered. While the Salafis Ibn Taymiyyah reason is incapable of understanding truth and in religious cognition lacks prestige and performance. Mulla Sadra’s philosophical reason to intellectual in the Quran and hadith is considered close, and that’s why in religious cognition is valid.