Review and compare the amount of attention to lexical sciences In two commentaries “Al-Kashaf and Al-Mizan (With the focus of Surah Towbah)

It is worth noting that linguistic sciences are among the most important sciences from which the Interpreters have benefited in interpreting and analyzing the Qur’anic text, besides concentrating on its goal and reaching its goals united with other contexts to form an integrated interpretive Structure. As the two interpreters (Al-Zamakhshari and Allama Tabataba’i) used linguistic Investigations in terms of grammar, morphology and eloquence in their interpretation, they differed in the percentage of employment for these detectives, and their goal was to interpret the Qur’anic text and reach its meaning. Note that the explanatory method followed by Allama Tabatabai in his Mizan is the method of interpreting the Qur’an with the Qur’an, but that did notp him from using linguistic investigations in his interpretation. AL- Zamakhshari, on the other hand, in most cases he tries to adapt these investigations to serve his creedal doctrine. Accordingly, at the grammatical level, the interpreters employed most of the grammatical Chapters of vocabulary and structures, and left some of them. Thus, they varied in terms of Employment, so Al-Zamakhshari was more valuable in the field of vocabulary, and Allama Tabataba’I used more methods and sentences because of their importance in the interrelationship Of the Qur’anic text. In regards to the morphological level, despite the large number of Morphological investigations, the interpreters were limited to restricted topics and excelled in Their use, the Allama al-Taba’I over al-Zamakhshari, and they are topics that singled out the Source and derivatives, in addition to the significance of its morphological evidence. As for the Morphological level, the rhetorical investigations had a significant share among the interpreters in its three chapters, in terms of semantics, rhetoric, and the literary techniques. Subsequently, Al-Tabataba’I was more used and employed by al-Zamakhshari for these investigations, especially in metaphors, metaphors and metonyms, especially those that revolve around the Meaning that imposes itself in the interrelation of meaning.