Abuse by the employee to centralize the job A comparative study between the Republic of Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iran

Author:
Baqer Fadel Abbas
Level:
Master
Field of study:
Low
Language:
Arabic
Faculty:
Faculty of Law
Year:
2021
Publisher:
URD Press
Supervisor(s):
Mohsen Malik Afzali

The study dealt with the abuse in the employee’s use of his job position, and it is a comparative study between the Republic of Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iran, as the study included the importance of administrative control over the employee’s abuse of his authority, through the administrative control over the abuse of the employee, to make his authority restricted and to indicate the abuse of the employee in the field of his authority  The discretion related to his administrative activity in addition to

 Proving the defect of the employee’s abuse of power through the weak role of administrative oversight, leading to the oversight of the employees’ work through the data of Iranian laws, and here comes the role of administrative oversight also on the work of employees in Iran, in addition to explaining the effects of the apparent spread of abuse in government departments and its consequences, as there are  A study to find appropriate solutions to reduce the spread of job abuse

 We reached important results, including that the phenomenon of abuse in the employee’s use of his position is one of the most important challenges facing all societies.  The spread of corruption And its diversity and spread, which negatively affects societies, and the phenomenon of administrative corruption is one of the most dangerous manifestations that prey on the entity of societies and developed and even underdeveloped countries.  This phenomenon is of interest and a point of discussion for researchers in all fields, and this has led to the cooperation of international efforts to combat this phenomenon through many international organizations and institutions.  Administrative, in accordance with the general rule of evidence and to clarify the burden of proving the defect of abus