The Social Effects of Unification Between the Two Interpretations of the Balance and in the Shadows of the Qur’an (A Comparative Study)

The Noble Qur’an, with its greatness, embraces among its folds the vast oceans of knowledge that we cannot access no matter how hard we try, and because it is the Holy Book of God that was revealed to His servants to clarify for them the path of their lives and guide them to the path of righteousness, it was the wisdom of the Creator in it to draw a picture of social life with all Its contradictions, that is the image that the research in its chapters and discussions tried to shed light on by comparing the methodologies of both Allamah Al-Tabatabai and Sayyid Qutb in studying or investigating the features of the social impact in the Holy Qur’an, adopting the analytical and explanatory approach to reach the required results, if monotheism refers to every origin From the ideological foundations to him, he spreads the one origin in its branches – according to the mark’s expression – and if monotheism is linked to beliefs, then the mark links it with morals, that is the paradoxical link between faith and unbelief – hypocrisy.

As for the goal of this thesis, it is to identify the points of similarity and difference, and to define the concept of monotheism from the point of view of the commentators, and to clarify the relationship of monotheism to society. Which is based on recognizing the phenomenon in its study and eliciting results from it, and this method makes use of the Internet, printed books, and Persian and Arabic articles.

The researcher relied mainly on two sources in his research, namely, the interpretation of Al-Mizan by Al-Tabtabaei and in the shadows of the Qur’an by Sayyid Qutb, as well as other sources. The researcher chose the analytical and explanatory approach in studying his subject, as they are the most appropriate in the appropriateness of the nature of the research.

The research reached a set of results, including the encyclopedic view of Allama al-Tabataba’i and the comprehensiveness of his view of the concept of monotheism, and the concept of society as well, and Allama al-Tabataba’i’s attempt to encompass concepts by invoking social and anthropological theories, which reveals to us his breadth of knowledge and an attempt to employ this broadness in enriching his interpretation. Sayyid Qutb’s literary approach was based on books of jurisprudence, hadith and Sunnah, and his speech was directed, as he used many new terms.