Explore the relationship between religion and morality in terms of master Mostafa Malekian and Professor Seyyed Hossein Nasr

in recent decades, with the flourishing of som philosophys, the issue “religion and ethics” had studied and discussed in theology, philosophy of religion and ethics. This article is a brief look at this issue from the perspective of two of the great thinkers; master Mostafa Maleki and doctor Seyyed Hossein Nasr. The basic idea in the first chapter discussion questions and some of the topics discussed was the place that have been causing this issue, and have analysis exposition. In addition to defining religion and ethics, the types of relationships that can be mentioned to mention. then relativity and applied ethics has discussed and its application have defended. In second chapter I discussed the Malekians ideas. Malekian is an enlightened rationalist that everything is seen through the lens of reason so is so interested in modernity. In His perspective goodness and evil identified wih the reason and moral is independ from religion in definition. But abaut the cases issues that are well defined and contain obscenity, reason is incomplete and incapable, and this verdict as to the dependence of morality to religion. He also believes in absolute morality. He also believes the religion depends on morality in the beginning. Comments Nasr have been examined in third Chapter. Nasr’s intellectual is traditionalism and perennial wisdom. He  believes the definition of the goodness and evil inherent intellectual, but claims: moral related to religion Nasrs looking to the exist contain Being associated with the sacred and divine’re. So not only ethics, but in no area accepts secularism. He declines looking down and shabby dignity as a human being and Reviews it. He thinks: this bad looking to the human and exist, coms from the separation between ethics and science from sacred. Nasr also considers the moral absolute.