The vote on the verbal sign Krajky

Krajky was one of the scientists Shiite elites that was applicable  in scientific problems and has writed many books and papers to serve the shia word and suffering a lot for writing these books and has travelled to many cities for publishing these books. Sheikh Mofid contributed to development of theological and juridical personality of  Krajky that after the sheikh Mufid Krajky with other students of sheikh mufid propounded usage of wits in the Words and Jurisprudence.it has been tried in this thesis   to examine thw Verbal figures and Theological ideas of Krajky that is one of  the  speakers in Baghdad bureau . however he also is disciple of sheikh mufid and seyyed morteza and in discussion of Imam sciece Krajky votes is closer to Seyyed Morteza votes.but however his intellectual orientation in the ideological and Juridical problems is closer to Sheikh Mufid. His intellectual approach to the fundamentals of religion following the Qur’an and Traditions and rational reasons but his attention to traditions is more and it can be found from books and papers that role of traditions in explaining issues is very significant. Allama Krajky in theological problems Most of the discussion focused on theology and leadership that his leadership discussion is very significant and extendly with rational and traditional reasons has proved public and private leadership debate In contrast, they briefly discussed the issue of prophecy. Krajky  to prove theological issues had innovations . for example with debate to a scholar has proved this problem that has been pointed out in this thesis. One of the characteristics Krajky is his attention to the ethical and behavioral aspects that it’s specified from his papers and books and has writed papers about parents refinement and parents rights.