Adherence to the jurisprudential views

One of the issues that has not been studied independently in jurisprudence is compliance. In this research, it has been tried to examine the compliance with Islamic jurisprudential views and extracting relevant judgments. This research investigates the differences and cognition from the point of view of jurisprudential religions and has been studied in a comparative way from the perspective of the jurisprudents of the jurisprudential religions. In jurisprudential religions, there are differences in the field of adherence, which sometimes differ in some cases based on the jurisprudential foundations of the jurisprudents of that religion. To this end, in this research, compliance is assigned to five sections of jurisprudential jurisprudence. The first chapter addresses the generalities and concepts of adherence, which results in the difference between the word and the term. The second chapter of compliance in purification, which is based on the adherence of persons and objects to each other, which has been adhered to in all three cases, but has no particular proof, but is an evidentiary one. The third chapter of allegiance to Islam and disbelief is to examine the missing child, or the same thing, in Dar alـIslam and Dar alـKahf, which results in the fact that the person is following the location of the discovery in order to reach the true verdict or, in other words, the actual way. In Chapter 4 of the Law of Obligations, he examines the adherence of a woman to a spouse and a parent from a parent’s choice. And in the fifth chapter, property adherence is based on two axes of adherence to mines and adherence to marriage and marriage contracts.