Intellect and narration as criteria for evaluating theoretical mysticism proposition

Theoretical mysticism regarding  to measurability theory needs any criteria to justify the  truth or falsity of its predicates. This criteria is a cognitive system which supervise the predicates of theoretical mysticism. This system consisting of any existing principles which act as truth sentences. The criteria is consisting of two parts.  The first part is religion criteria which is based on narrative predicates and the second part is rational criteria which is based on intellectual predicates  . Each of this parts having  two kinds.. .basic criteria and non basic criteria.  basic criteria are essential …real and positive predicates which are absolutely truth and infallible . and non basic criteria are  gradual …..definite  and theoretical predicates which are conditionally truth. in this cases the  falsity  and fallibility of  this  predicates is  passible . In religion literature basic criteria is named proofs which are  considered positive reasons and sufficient  documents to interpret religion and non basic  criteria are named Tanjizat which are considered conditional and variable documents. Religion criteria is considered a supervision system that supervise mysticism  predicates which evaluate this predicates on behalf of religion reason. In the cases there is no such as this criteria we should refer to Tanjizat.