Sources and Methodology of Nasiri Zaidiyyah’s Fiqh with the Focus on the Book al-Ebanah and Correction of the Books al-Teharah and al-Salat

After being formed as a sect of Shiite sects, Zaydiyya introduced a new discourse in beliefs and Fiqh. The three branches of belief of Jarudiyah, Sulaimaniyah and Batriyah have been recorded for Zaydiyya in the books of sects and denominations. From Jaroudieh, two branches of Fiqh of Ghasemiyeh and Nasiriyah called two jurists with Zaidi thought and discourse maker, namely Qasim ibn Ibrahim Rasi (d. 246 AH) and Hassan ibn Ali, known as Nasser Utroush, one in Yemen and the other in northern Iran was formed differently.

This research focuses on copies of unpublished books of Al-EBanah in Nasser Fiqh and correcting two important books (Taharat and Salat) in order to approach the sources, principles and method of Nasser and Nasserian Fiqh and its compatibility with the Fiqh of other religions. Al-Ebanah, which became the most important book and the focus of jurisprudential discussions of the Nasiri Zaydis after its writing, was written by Husami and then explained. Theological thoughts, jurisprudential opinions and many unknown works of Nasser Utroush with a new approach and based on the newly found points in the manuscripts of Al- Ebanah, which is an encyclopedia of Fiqh, theology and history of the Nasserites; We followed. After elaborating on the biography and works of the founder of Nasiri Fiqh and his Zaidi ideas in Fiqh and theology and introducing Abu Ja’far Husami, the author of the book Al- Ebanah, a chapter of this research to know the jurisprudential sources of Nasser Kabir and his special interpretations of the book and tradition, attention to leaders Imams, especially Imam Sadegh and his approach to consensus and analogy. After introducing and arranging the jurisprudential sources, we examined the characteristics and method of Nasser in extracting the rulings and his privileged view of ijtihad in another chapter and found that while adhering to the beliefs of Zaidi, Etrat-oriented jurist, perfectionist, cautious and in the fight against heresies. due to the commonality of Nasserite Fiqh with Imamiyya in sources and special attention to the narrations and opinions of Etrat in deriving rulings, Nasser Fiqh is close to Imami Fiqh in symbolic Shiite issues and the independence of his jurisprudential opinions in many issues were clear.