The Right to General Strike and its Impact on the Emerging Organizational Relationships Between the Employee and the Public Office A Comparative Study Between Iraqi law and Algerian law

The staff group is one of the groups that governments depend on to achieve their goals in various fields. In addition, all communities respect this group because their work is focused on achieving the public interest, so they Must do their job tasks permanently, continuously and completely, and not allowed. He may leave his job without any valid excuse, but sometimes he may refuse to do his job as a means of pressuring the government to achieve legitimate demands. Work strikes, one of the fundamental rights recognized by most international charters and conventions and national laws, were different. Related legal systems, as permitted by some laws, such as the Algerian law, and criminalized by others, such as the Iraqi penal code. This is a fundamental and legal right like any other right, but it is not an absolute right from any limitation. And on the other hand, to achieve their goal, and it is worth noting that most countries in the world have enshrined this right in their laws and constitutions, and these international treaties and charters guarantee it. Contrary to what is in Algerian law, the affairs of Iraq have not yet been regulated by a specific law, so in our study we will explain the concept of the right to strike and how it is implemented in comparative countries, referring to the most important international charters and treaties that And how they affect the organizational relationship between the employee and the public situation, as we relied on the descriptive and analytical and comparative methods in this study, led to the fact that the right to strike is a legal right. , And this is one of the public rights recognized by most of the Constitution.