Critical analysis of the thoughts of Salahuddin Abdolfattah Al-Khalidi with the focus on Kulini’s book and his interpretations of the Qur’anic verses in the book of the Usul al-kafi

The study found that:

In this study, Mr. Khaledi intended to prove infidelity and polytheism against the Shiites in any way, even if it was by distorting the words of the Shiites.

He has not fulfilled what he has stipulated in the introduction of the book that he should not quote weak and glorious narrations and that he should go to the correct narrations of the sufficient book.

Although Mr. Khaledi has a good command of the book, he has deviated because he has been selective in his discussions.

The problem that can be seen in all of Mr. Khaledi’s books is that the mere existence of a narration in hadith books, the Shiites have introduced it as a Shiite belief and according to it has excommunicated the Shiites, while quoting a hadith is not a reason to believe in its content.

Abd al-Fattah, like all Wahhabis, considers all creatures to be in the presence of God, and therefore considers monotheism to be a denial of the system of cause and effect. Although the Shiites have done little to address the issue of monotheism, it may be because they did not feel the need to discuss it because they considered it necessary and obvious. Since the subject of this research is the critique of Khaledi’s thoughts from the book of Klini and the interpretation of Al-Batniya, so it should be done in the same way as the book, and because in that book there was a combination of rational discussions in a polemical and narrative way, this The research has followed the same method and theological, rijali, hadith and Quranic sciences have been brought to the occasion and is a combination of reason and narration. As a result, we want to respond to Abdolfattah Khaledi’s objections and his critique of Shiism, and we find that what he attributes to Shiism is more in line with his own religion.