Administrative guardianship of the central government over the decentralized legal entity in Iraqi law

Author:
Haider Mazen Selim
Level:
Master
Field of study:
Low
Language:
Arabic
Faculty:
Faculty of Law
Year:
2021
Publisher:
URD Press
Supervisor(s):
Morteza Elyasi

In this study, we try to briefly explain what has been discussed before. In the first chapter, the concept of administrative governance and its conceptual role in concentration and decentralization are discussed. In this chapter, we define the administrative province (issue one) and the nature of the administrative oversight system (issue two) and the position of the judiciary vis-.-Vis the proxy government (section one) and the distinction between the administrative province and the central government (section two). In the second discussion, we will discuss the principles of administrative decentralization and its pillars in administrative law and compare them with the principles of federalism or political decentralization. We will divide this material into two parts. In the second chapter, we will discuss the responsibility of local authorities to the central government, the first of which is related to the oversight of local authorities by the executive branch. In the second issue, we monitor the actions of local authorities. But in the second discussion, we will explain the definition of administrative supervision in three issues: the first issue is about the lexical and idiomatic definition of supervision, the second issue is related to the parties of administrative supervision. The third issue deals with the tools and methods of administrative oversight. The third issue includes the cooperation and differences between regulatory authorities specializing in the fight against corruption in Iraq and has two issues: The first issue deals with the oversight powers of administrative groups. The second issue is about the manifestations of cooperation between regulatory authorities. The third chapter deals with everything that the Iraqi legislature sets as an administrative method for unorganized provinces (both in the effective constitution and in the provincial law of 2115), which is in line with what we discussed in the first article on the principles of administrative decentralization. We conclude with a conclusion and on the conformity or non-conformity of the mentioned principles of decentralization with some suggestions we came to the conclusion that we believe should be considered.