Non-Judicial Means to Solve Custom Disputes.A Comprson Study Among The Iraqi، Algerian and Egptian Law

As countries’ economic systems improved، so did customs disputes. In such a way that these disputes in the contemporary era are not limited to the classical way of activities، but governments became more involved with it and took on various roles in all fields. Accordingly، the customs administration found itself in the new government in the face of missions and large levels in which it had to carry out basic and various operations. Thus، the need for customs management for general projects increased، and as a result، other ways than the judiciary were considered as a substitute for dispute settlement in general and customs disputes in particular، and were among the most important effective solutions to settle disputes، which was considered to be of great importance to the legislators، and this is due to its impartial method of settling disputes، as well as its features، including reducing the pressure on the judiciary، reducing costs and accelerating dispute settlement.

Through research and analysis in the legislation of comparative countries،we find that the Iraqi legislature has adopted non-judicial methods for resolving customs disputes and has adopted administrative tools such as protesting against customs interception and reconciliation institutions،while the Algerian legislature He followed the same method of the Iraqi legislator،despite the differences in some conditions and procedures،relying on the same method،and in the case of the Egyptian legislator،he had a different approach by adopting customs reconciliation and customs arbitration.