Balance Between Keeping Job Secrets and Having to Report Administrative Violations

The study dealt with the balance between maintaining job secrets and the necessity of reporting administrative violations, as the study included the definition of the concept of budget through the definition of budget language and idiomatically, and a statement of the definition of job secrets through knowing job secrets language and idiomatically, and a statement of the emergence and development of job secrets before the entry into force of Law No. 14 For the year 1991 and after the entry into force of Law No. 14 of 1991 in order to reach the legal and legal basis for preserving functional secrets and the obligatory news about the administrative violation through the statement of the legal basis for maintaining functional secrets, and the statement of the legal basis for maintaining functional secrets and the statement of state secrets through contract theory as well as theory Deposit, agency contract theory, service rent theory and other theories such as the general theory of relativity, up to the obligatory news about administrative violations by showing the types of administrative violations through the moral and material pillars. The truth does not lie in societies that are characterized by corruption, but this problem lies in the spread and diversity of corruption And its expansion, as we reached important results, including that the phenomenon of divulging secrets is one of the most dangerous manifestations Destroy the entity of societies, developed and even developing countries. As a result of this negative effects that may be left by the phenomenon of job disclosure of secrets and its terrible and rapid development, which took it away from the local domain to enter it into the global domain, this phenomenon has become a point of interest and a point of discussion for researchers in all fields, and this has led to the cooperation of international efforts to combat this phenomenon through many organizations And international institutions, that the burden of proof is considered a responsibility to establish evidence of the sincerity of the claim before the judiciary, and it falls as a general asset on the plaintiff in the administrative case, according to the general rule of evidence.