Judicial control over government institutions in the protection of human rights, a comparative study in Iraq, Iran and Egypt

Most of the constitutions tended to endorse rights and freedoms and how to protect them through the judicial authority’s oversight of government institutions, especially in the face of management decisions by providing for the establishment of a council or a bureau that monitors the work of the administration and contains an administrative court whose mission is to consider the appeals submitted before it by canceling the violating decisions The law that affects the individual in his reconciliation and negatively affects his legal status and can implement its decisions because the administration is in constant contact with individuals and indeed these courts have been established and there is a specialized judiciary to look into these cases and decide them in isolation from the ordinary judiciary.

Since the philosophy of the existence of the judiciary is the protection of human rights, which is the clear purpose of the existence of the judiciary, so we will briefly discuss human rights and focus on the courts of administrative justice and their importance. Studying its role in controlling administrative decisions through its creation, formation, how to file a lawsuit before it, formal procedures, and appealing its decisions in the countries under comparison, leaving the rest of the administration’s work