the Legal Organization for the Appointment and Dismissal of the Governor in the Province: A Comparative Study between Iraq and Egypt

The governor is considered primarily responsible for public morals and values in his governorate, and is concerned with protecting people’s rights, security, and safety in cooperation with administrative officials with specialization in the governorate, while ensuring that he works within the framework of central economic, political, social, and security policies. And for this reason, the governorates suffer from a major imbalance due to the lack of interest of the governors in the real and fair integrated development and investment plans that are presented by the concerned specialists in this regard in the governorate and under the direct supervision of the governor, and they are studied by him at length and discussed in official documented sessions. On which the sustainable growth of Al-Maha depends, and hence the need for values in coordination with all ministries, including the Ministry of the Interior concerned with protecting state property and public money and lifting abuses and justifications for them through administrative and legal methods. Here we must talk a little about these traditions that have become managed upside down with the involvement of many governors in corruption Administrative and financial and It transgresses people’s rights. The law has the right to appoint and dismiss a governor that differs from one country to another, depending on the set of legislations that have been put in place for this matter. This is the main question: What is the legal regulation for appointing and dismissing a governor in Iraq and Egypt? What we are studying in this study is the legal organization for the appointment and dismissal of the governor in the governorate / a comparative study between Iraq and Egypt. The researcher will follow the historical approach in addition to the descriptive analytical approach due to its suitability to the subject of the study. The study ends with a set of findings, recommendations and reference lists. The study concluded with a set of recommendations, the most important of which are: searching for a mechanism to ensure the successful implementation of the laws of provincial and municipal councils locally, and enacting legislation to ensure that the judiciary becomes an effective, independent and non-politicized authority.