Media coverage of the performance of the work of the Iraqi Electoral Commission for the year 2021, Al-Iraqiya and Al-Hurra channels (A comparative study)

In this study, I dealt with the responsibility of the subordinate for the action of the subordinate in Islamic jurisprudence and Iraqi legislation, and it turns out that the responsibility of the subordinate for the action of the subordinate is a form of responsibility for the work of others, and the responsibility for the work of others is one of the cases of tort responsibility, and tort liability represents civil liability alongside contractual liability. and it represents an aspect of legal responsibility, and all of these forms fall within the concept of responsibility in general, and in principle, the person is only asked about his personal action, but the responsibility of the subordinate for the act of his subordinate is an exception to him, and now the reason behind the recognition of this responsibility, is In order to protect the injured person, so that he can obtain the guarantee, As the subordinate person is often in a well-off situation, unlike that of the subordinate person who is insolvent, and the Iraqi legislator in Article (219) of the Civil Code established the civil liability of the subordinate for the damage caused by the subordinate’s action, according to the principle of supposed error, and did not establish a general rule According to which the subordinate person is determined, rather he went to specify the persons who are responsible for the subordinate person for the act of his subordinate, and the matter is also no different in Islamic jurisprudence, responsibility for the work of others is an exception to the principle, and Islamic jurisprudence in principle bases the guarantee on the idea of harm that binds each individual to the consequences His actions, even if that person is not distinguished, so Islamic jurisprudence does not take the principle of questioning a person about the actions of others, except in the case of coercion that individual, In the event that he commits a harmful act due to the effect of coercion on him, he is considered to have no will and bears the responsibility for the coercive act, and the person is not responsible for the action of others in other than that. In order for the subordinate’s responsibility to be established for subordinate actions, there must be a subordination bond between two people in which one of the parties is subject to the other, and this image is achieved if the subordinate has the right to control and issue instructions to the subordinate. And that the harmful act occurred during the performance of the work assigned to him or because of him or on his occasion, and that the Islamic Sharia jurisprudence in his view of the subordinate does not differ from the legal jurisprudence, as the subordinate is a person working for his account and for the benefit of another person, and the subordinate is subject to the actual command and authority of the subordinate. The responsibility of the subordinate is original and direct because he is responsible for his own action. The subordinate may absolve himself of liability if he is able to prove that he has taken all possible care to prevent the harm from occurring.