The Constitutional Framework of the Right to Resist Tyranny a Comparative Study between Iraq and Tunisia

The current constitutional legislators are not simply trying to remove this right from the legal status, but are committed to criminalizing it. Issuing legislation and issuing legal texts to punish anyone who uses this right to resist tyranny. Legislators deal with individuals or people on the basis of distrust and suspicion of people, and this is the basis for establishing authority. The goal of this topic is to maintain order and security among citizens. Its existence and its existence does not allow it to violate the rights and freedoms of citizens, and the assumption of the deviation and tyranny of the authority is allowed. The objective of this topic is to maintain order and security among citizens, because the necessity of its existence and its existence does not allow it to violate the rights and freedoms of citizens, and it is possible to assume the deviation and tyranny of the authority. The path of authority and the preservation of all rights and freedoms in order to establish a state of justice and law. In this research, we relied on two analytical approaches; the descriptive approach to describe the nature of this right and to clarify the doctrinal position on it and the comparative approach to sorting out the constitutional limits to organize this right in the various constitutional documents, especially in Iraqi and Tunisian law