The conclusion and ratification of international treaties in the Iraqi and Lebanese legal system

Federal constitutions play a good role in explaining the nature of international competences, as well as the bodies that are competent to exercise them. These constitutions should also be reviewed. We find that they have taken two different trends in order to regulate the validity of the conclusion of international treaties, because some federal constitutions have turned to the unity of foreign policy, including the conclusion of international treaties. Limiting the powers to the government, and some gave the union members from the states or regions the validity of some treaties, as happened in Iraqi Kurdistan.

The issue of defining the bodies responsible for concluding international treaties in Iraq, according to the constitution in force in 2005, aroused a lot of widespread controversy. Do a lot of activities that have an international character.

The international treaty represents the basic tool that is used for cooperation between states because through treaties documenting and organizing various international relations, although most of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Contracting Treaties of 1969 reflect what has been settled by international custom and the international treaty must be clear when contracting As the international practice and application of the law of treaties has proven problems in interpretation between the parties to them, and they often cause the emergence of many disputes between the parties to the treaty, and here there is a need to rely on interpretation, which produces more effective effects between the parties to the treaty.