A comparative study of the conduct of the purified Imams (peace be upon them) and that of other Alids against governors in the second century

This research  has been compiled in four chapters. The first chapter of the two branches of Shia, Shiite and Zaidi and political Andyshh Hay and polished, the second chapter to the tradition of Imam Sadiq (Lyh Alslam) Umayyad caliphs for contemporaries and also dealt with Sire Sire other Alavi led uprisings have been compared over time. If you look at the difference between these two deeds, but only under the supervision of a target with two imams have been looking Imami. In the third chapter to the tradition of Imam Sadiq (Lyh Alslam) for comparison with other Alavian Abbasid and polished, but here coordination is clearly seen before, although their mobility goals Imam Sadiq (Lyh Alslam) conducted is. The final chapter deals with the political behavior of Imam Kadhim and Imam Reza (Lyhma Alslam) was studied in relation to the time and manner of their head martyr Fkh Alavi and Ibn Tbatba compared. Sire is the Imam of the time and refused to compromise with the state of armed conflict with them. Uprising martyr Fkh sided relationship with the tradition of Imam Kadhim (Lyh Alslam) but for some reason it has not been the imam publicly to defend the uprising. The uprising Uprising of Imam Zaid has been serving purposes. Ibn uprising Tbatba although for reasons that will come out of the discussion, but it Prdakhthshdhast. The uprising in the previous uprisings can not serve as imams know the benefits it should not be forgotten. So Imam Imami tradition of tolerance and avoidance of armed uprising in the second century but Alavian behavior was armed uprising. In comparing these two apparently a reciprocal relationship and lifestyle can be said of the relationship is one-sided and some of the uprising was done with the consent of the Imam.