Jjurisprudential Opinions of Rabi ibn Habib and Sheikh Sadough in Ibāḍiyya and Imamites Jurisprudence (with emphasis on two books Jami Sahih and Man lā yahduruhu al-Faqīh)
- Author:
- Arash Anvari
- Level:
- Master
- Subject(s):
- Fiqh religions
- Language:
- Farsi
- Faculty:
- Faculty of Islamic Denominations
- Year:
- 2015
- Publisher:
- URD Press
- Supervisor(s):
- Sadegh Pour Heidari
- Advisor(s):
- Hamid Malek Makan
This research compares the jurisprudential opinions of Rabi ibn Habib and Sheikh Sadough in Ibāḍiyya and Imamites jurisprudence (with emphasis on two books Jami Sahih and Man lā yahduruhu al-Faqīh). This research is a descriptive method research based on library resources. The first chapter deals with the concepts and the formation of the Ibāḍiyya and Imamites denominations and it becomes distinct that the formation origin of these two denominations is different and in the next part deals with Rabi ibn Habib and Sheikh Sadough characters. Rabi ibn Habib is the third Ibadi imam. His book, Jami Sahih is hadith oriented and consists of four branches; including traditions in theological and jurisprudential issues. Sheikh Sadough is a prior Shiite scholar. His book, Man lā yahduruhu al-Faqīh is hadith oriented either and its traditions are in the fields of jurisprudence. Resources of Ibāḍiyya Juridical deduction include the Quran, Sunnah, consensus and juristic opinion. Juristic opinion is the exercise of legal reasoning and analogical reasoning that in this research the later one is studied. Juridical deduction in Imamites jurisprudence includes the Quran, Sunnah, consensus and discernment and it becomes distinct that these two denominations besides differences participate in the Quran, Sunnah and consensus. The third chapter compares jurisprudential opinions of Rabi ibn Habib in Jami Sahih and Sheikh Sadough in Man lā yahduruhu al-Faqīh, regarding the order of branches based on Jami Sahih. These ten branches are state of purity, prayer, fasting, Zakat, Hajj, marriage, divorce, sale, orders, faith and vows in which the last branch is consist of four sections: blood-money, discernment, heritage, manumission of slave and Will. From comparison of the two books was concluded that Sheikh Sadough has stated a full and regular jurisprudential traditions for deduction following each branch; while Rabi has not mentioned about a lot of issues and has left the problem unsaid. Participation in the branches of state of purity, prayer, fasting, Hajj, Zakat and sale that may affect approximation of two denominations.