“Eternity in Torment on Shiite, Mu’tazilite and Zaidi perspective”

This thesis is about eternity in torment from the perspective of Shiite, Zaidi and Mu’tazilite.  Shia believes that Muslim sinners in hell are not eternal and committing the cardinals is faithful and believes punishment is temporary and hence eligible for amnesty and intercedes. Mu’tazilite believed that the action is part of the truth of faith, however, if sinning faithful, not an unbeliever, but between belief and unbelief is in a position by following the consensus of the Ummah, such individual is known only miscreants. Then because of distinguishing his attributes of believers, disbelievers and the hypocrites know him as Manzel bien al- anzelatein. Mu’tazila followers to prove immortality committed a cardinal on fire have cited logical reasons and traditions like rational reasons: the prohibition of merit and bounty committing indecency, prohibition of society deserve reward and punishment and blame. Traditional reasons (verses and hadiths) also cited that is mentioned in the following dissertation. Zaidi followers believe committed the cardinal is not a disbeliever, not a faithful, but is unfaithful and immoral. Hence the name of faithful and hypocrites on him, they thoroughly lose hold position it as the Manzel bien al-Manzelatein. Zaidi followers believe in immortality that are great and deserves punishment for their sins and no repentance, if he committed a cardinal urged the world to go to hell and there is Mokhelled. They cite to Islamic and rational reasoning (verses and hadiths). They express rational reasons: if evil is not entitled to torment, in fact is encouraged to do sin again.