The position of man in being from the perspective of Hayashi and Ibn Arabi
- Author:
- Ali Ansari Moghaddam
- Level:
- Master
- Subject(s):
- Sufism and Islamic mysticism
- Language:
- Farsi
- Faculty:
- Faculty of Mysticism
- Year:
- 2019
- Publisher:
- URD Press
- Supervisor(s):
- Reza Elahimanesh
- Advisor(s):
- Rahman Bolhasani
This treatise attempts to study the dynamism of Mohid al-Din Arabi, the noble religion of Islam, and the great Buddha of the Western world, about the status of man in one. Man is obviously the subject of this thinking, but man is contemplated by Ibn Arabi and Hedarz for a particular area of the site. In his thinking of the early Hedgesar, the so-called “Dazean” has been mentioned, and has been described later. He always has his main question of being, both in relation to man (Dazeyn). Hence, the book begins with the need to clearly begin the question of necessity when it comes to clearly identifying a question from one. Humans, in the words of phenomenology, are attempting to reveal this existence to the Dazinian named workshop, so that he can ask himself some questions from a reviewer at the beginning of the Dazeen era. Being – in the world, it is Dazeen’s as an apparent existential. Existentialism relates to the relationship between Dasin and those who are not, and this is the basis for overcoming the metaphysics. The Hydrogen Player of the Year tries to show that there is another sign that there is not only that, but also that it is in the spirit of its own and in the hands of others. It is a self-study of the existence of time to understand, rather than studying a self-proclaimed initiator named Dazeyn for understanding the universe. “The analysis and analysis of its own manifests itself in terms of” existence “(Dasien). On the other hand, Arabic works can be used to describe the realities of the reservoir in Iran. The starting point of human thinking is the term “comprehensive”. The other topics and sources of information available in the context of the comprehensive Baku, and other definitions that indicate either a particular aspect of the human reality, can be understood. Despite the differences between the two, there are many commonalities between them, so that it is possible to find a reliable source for these two-tier inventors. However, these treatises have been tried, albeit in a way, to spell these similarities and insights.