Terms, rules and functions of the extraction from the point of view of jurisprudential religions

Author:
Atefeh Islami
Level:
Master
Subject(s):
Fiqh religions
Language:
Farsi
Faculty:
Faculty of Islamic Denominations
Year:
2019
Publisher:
URD Press
Supervisor(s):
Ibrahim Qasemi
Advisor(s):
Sadegh Pourheidari

The discussion is based on the jurisprudential jurisprudential issues in the Islamic world, which different religious jurisprudents have in common with it. In this field, the Imams’ jurisprudence has been widely discussed and is also the subject of Islamic jurisprudential doctrines. This research, with an analytical descriptive approach and a search of written sources in libraries and electronic resources, has discussed the issue. The abstract and abstract are that the topic of empiricism in the jurisprudence of Imamiyah and jurisprudence has commonalities and distinctions that can be applied to prayer  The plot, the statement of the messenger, and its place in the verbs of Mobah, referred to both.  The types of traditions and narratives from the infallible area (PBUH) are a major distinction of the Muslims, although they have also narrated some of the great prophets of Islam in this regard, but their reliance on prayer and subsequent prayer is the same  There is a request for consultation from Allah Almighty, and there are many views on this.  The work of the inshore is more immanent than Imamieh, which can be seen in the written works, and we conclude that the main purpose of the quartet is not, from our point of view, realized in our view.  In this research, for the first time, the conditions, rules, and functions of emancipation between the Imams and the religions were studied.