Investigation of the problem of counter arguments for the existence of God Based on George Mavrodes’s plan of Reformed nature of proof

There is a problem in the tradition of classical argumentation for the existence of God which is “the problem of counter arguments for the existence of God”. Any proof that has been made to prove the existence of God has a counter proof of a single mechanism which is presented by the Atheist. Our claim in this study is that in the philosophy of religion, there is the theory and a plan for redefining the proof or the reformed nature of the proof which can lead to the emergence of the tradition of proving the existence of God. By using the reformed nature scheme of the proof of a reformed epistemologist and philosopher George Mavrodes, we will show that the believer continues to believe in the proofs of the existence of God and can be reasonable. In addition to the fundamental elements of the traditional interpretation of the argument, soundness and validity, he spoke of the synthetic and subjective concepts, which is a way of solving the problem of counter arguments for the existence of God.