Analyze and criticize the traditional evidences of the Shi’a Sufi Paths

Sufism, as a school that has a mystical view to the religion, has faced many positioning and perspectives throughout history. The change in the situation of Sheikhs and Sufism strata from the simple living to the luxuries and from reality to imagination and their resort to some of the traditional documentations from the Qur’an and narratives to explain the legitimacy of good deeds of Sufism on the one hand, and on the other, the protest of the jurists and scholars to Sufism on mocking religion in various categories become a motive that this treatise examines the traditional evidence of the Shi’a Sufi good deeds and analyzes and criticizes the Sufi citation for the Quran and hadith in the four principles of Nematollahiye, Zahabiye, Khaksariyeh and Ahle Hagh using the library sources and field research. The definition of these four sects from good deeds as well as their evidence is very similar and sometimes it can be said to be the same, and in some cases, the sheikhs have used the evidence of Sunni Sufi books and included in their discussions. The Sufis have resorted to the several verses and traditions such as monasticism and hadiths of good tradition in justifying the good deeds and have also brought some reasons for each deed, which the jurists, in interpreting the themes of such verses and narrations, did not consider a permission for innovation in religion (Sufism good deeds), and thus they consider these evidence as arbitrary interpretation and unfinished arguments.