Rereading and criticizing the method of reproach from the perspective of Sufi sheikhs until the end of the fifth century

In the second half of the third century, a group of Sufis laid the foundations of a reformist movement in Sufism, which was called the “Blame” method because of its method and adherence to certain beliefs. They were not a movement against Sufism, but by presenting principles and solutions, they wanted Sufism to return to its simple and basic principles and get rid of dress and grooming. The title of the forthcoming article is “Rereading and Criticizing the Method of Rebuke from the Perspective of Sufi Elders until the End of the Fifth Century”, the data of which are collected in a library method and processed by descriptive-analytical method and in three chapters: The elders of Sufism have been studied in the first period (third century), the middle period (fourth century) and the final period (fifth century). In the first period (third century), the elders of Baghdad, and among them, seriously criticized the principles of the mentioned method, which was based on the constant blame and accusation of the soul, and accused them of hypocrisy and dualism. In the Middle Ages (fourth century), some of the elders, who were mostly influenced by the elders of Baghdad and Junaid, reiterated their critique of their previous elders and, in addition, did not mention any of the infamous and main elders of Malamatiyeh in their works, which indicates There is an old fault between the Sufis of Baghdad and Khorasan. On the other hand, some Sufi elders and celebrities, by presenting a positive image of this sect, without any criticism, have introduced their principles and even placed them above the Sufis of the Baghdad school. Criticisms and comments were made in the early and middle period, when pollution and extremism had not yet taken hold of the blame. Most Sufi sheikhs in the last period (fifth century), while praising and respecting the previous rebukers, did not have a positive opinion about the rebukers of their time. In their view, such insights and actions of rebuke are outside the framework of Islamic law and are obscene. ¬Gary is done. According to the elders of this period, in the fifth century, Malamatiyeh distanced itself from its original principles and turned to perversion and extremism. The emergence of a number of notorious Kek Nekounami aggravated the issue of criticism and caused them to become more critical of the opposition. In this century, in addition to the Sufis, the official scholars also looked at the reproachers with criticism and skepticism. Also, some Sufis of this period, following the elders of Baghdad, have provided a more detailed account of their criticism.