Mystical Anthropology Based on the Comparative Assessment of the Thoughts of Seyed Heidar Amoli and Mir Seyyed Ali Hamedani

Given the anthropological crisis in contemporary times, the study of the subject of human and anthropology in the heritage of the ancestors, especially the Muslim mystics, can help us to face the crisis. Among the Muslim mystics with Shi’ite religion and beliefs, one can mention Sayyid Haydar Amoli and Mir Seyed Ali Hamedani, who refer to the mystical anthropology of detailed and profound material. These two mystics, in addition to referring to some general human issues, have placed him on two levels of individual and generalcharacter and As well as some of the mystical anthropological issuessuch as seven subtels of human reality, compulsury and freedom, and spirituality. From the comparative study of their ideas about human beings, one can conclude that:

The two mystics have a very common view of the intuitive, existential, ascending and desending degrees, as well as the perceptual levels of humanity, of which both are referred to as the “existential subtles”. Also comparing the views of the two mystics is that the issue of the province, the caliphate, and the capture of man and his other sons in the perspective of the two have a fundamental role. In these similarities, these two mystics do not agree on their spiritual wayfaring method and the mode of conduct, because the method of wayfaring and Soluk Seyyed Heidar Amoli is based on the ontological method of Ibn Arabi,But the method Mir Seyyed Ali Hamedani is based on Kubrawiyyah method and Shatar’s method.